JFK Assassination - Faking of Zapruder

http://www.rejectz.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2313

Since Jim and I began our JFK site lately we both have been surprised at the response we have recieved.

We fully expected to raise debate on the issue but were rather surprised at the Vehemance of Opposition to our work from some quarters. We were insulted, told we should receive the death penalty, ridiculed and more. Suffice to say we found the bahaviour very strange.

Other people applauded our work and some of the authors of JFK book and websites said we were on to something. We had already figured that, then a contact of authority in the JFK research community explained to us about the Government Disinformation Programs that are working in the JFK community.

We read the links that we were pointed to and then felt like ripe fools for being fooled for so long. Suddenly it all made sense. The tactics described were the exact tactics used against us and other people who have asked the "tricky questions' over the years.


Disinfo Tactics
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However, the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game

http://www.rejectz.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=2313
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.


Over the years there have been many mysterious deaths surrounding the JFK case along with many red herrings planted and much editing of film and photos evidence. So we understood the conspiracy was as such that it could only come from the top.

Once we understood this we looked at our postings and responses with new eyes and were amazed at how obvious it was. One thng that can be said after all this is a new phrase I have coined

The truth can always see a lie but a lie can't aways see the truth.

Mayet

JFK Assassination - Zapruder Fake Film

Recently I began to build a website regarding the JFK assassination and the Faking of the Zapruder film.

While investigating the film there were many inconsistenices that became apparent. These can be found at http://www.rejectz.com/ or the direct link of the JFK assassination website at http://www.rejectz.com/jfk.htm



In the photo above taken from a higher quality JPG's but there are a number of inconsistenices.

The picture here are supposed to represent two black men, one behind and one closer to the screen. They are both said to be clapping as the motorcade goes past as in the site banner above on the page.
The picture is indicative of photo fakery and edits. Zapruder is fake.

Point 1
The rear black man, that we call One Leg Man has what suspiciously looks like a pasted on head. he has no rear neck at all. The pixilation of green carries through where his neck should be. He is a black man, he should have a black neck. His grey suit is rather shadowy and translucent when compared to other parts of the picture. He has another green pixelation patch on the sleeve where his inner elbow is.
Point 2.
Compare the detail on the so called front "black man", who we call green man. Compare the detail at the back of his head to the black patch at the front that is supposed to represent his face. Look closely in this area, one could argue shadows but then shadows would go all the way down to his chest instead of ending, as the black patch does and then begins again.

Point 3.
Why does it look like there are pair of sunglasses in the middle of the picture down towards the bottom? Pay close attention to the middle section. Remember both these men are supposed to be clapping. We are supposed to be looking at the man behind's hands clapping. Is that what you see? How many people are in this picture and where exactly are they standing. Using Photoshop filters we are showing you here a few different perspectives of the same photo.
Point 4
The front man is supposed to be black, take a close look at his left hand, other than the shadows not matching pay close attention to the coloration on the wrist area and the dark patch at the fingers. One his right hand, well that whole area bears close scrutiny.
Remember here, if the photos are edited, they are edited to hide something, to change something. Because it is edited or edited out we can't see what was originally there, what was, we can only see the traces or remnants of the editing. We can only see the lie because what we are seeing is not the truth.
We can not, by looking at this picture tell what really was happening but what we can do is show you that possibly what you are supposed to be seeing, is not what you are seeing.




There is much more about this to be found on the website in question. http://www.rejectz.com/jfk2.htm